Jannah Theme License is not validated, Go to the theme options page to validate the license, You need a single license for each domain name.

A new system for appointing judges must be implemented: Govt targets the College once again

Kiren Rijiju, referring to the Supreme Court’s Collegium system of appointment to the higher judiciary, said on Thursday that this issue cannot be resolved until there is a “new system” for appointment. He linked the huge pendency of cases in courts to the vacant positions of judges.

It is his “obligation and duty to convey to the judiciary the message or sense of this House.”. He added, “there is a feeling among people of India that the long vacation which the courts receive is not very convenient for justice-seekers.”.

After criticizing the Collegium system as “opaque” in his remarks in the House, Rijiju called the Supreme Court’s 2015 ruling striking down the National Judicial Appointments Commission Act to be a severe compromise of parliamentary sovereignty and a disregard of the people’s mandate.

According to Rijiju, the number of pending cases in the country has reached 4.90 crore, a response to a question asked by Congress MP Rajeev Shukla in the Rajya Sabha about the number of working days of the courts.

According to him, there are several reasons for this, but the “primary reason is the appointment of judges” and vacancies in the sanctioned strength of the court.

According to the Minister’s written response, as of December 12, 2022, there were 25,011 sanctioned judges and 19,192 working judges in the Supreme Court, High Courts, district courts, and subordinate courts. He stated that 46 judges had been appointed to the Supreme Court between May 1, 2014 and December 5, 2022. As of December 1, 2022, there were 69,598 pending cases in the Supreme Court, as per the court’s own website, and 59.56 lakh pending cases in the High Courts.

There are very limited powers available to the government at this point to reduce vacancies. I would not like to comment much on the courts, as the government sometimes appears to interfere with the court’s powers. In accordance with the Constitution, the appointment process is the government’s responsibility, with the court’s consent. The situation changed after 1993. As part of our efforts to end the pending cases, we are offering our support; however, until we set up a new system for appointing judges, questions will continue to be raised regarding the appointment of judges.”

He cited the National Judicial Appointments Commission Bill, 2014, passed by Parliament unanimously, but the Supreme Court overturned it in 2015. In his opinion, the current system of appointing judges – the Collegium system – doesn’t reflect the feelings of the people. Many retired judges, including members of the Constitution Bench that struck down NJAC, have since stated publicly that striking down a law passed by Parliament is wrong.

Tiruchi Siva asked the Minister why there weren’t more women, SCs, STs, and OBCs judges. She said there wasn’t a reservation policy, but the government had written to High Court Chief Justices to make sure disadvantaged groups aren’t forgotten when recommending candidates. He said there had only been one ST judge before.

In response to vacations, the Minister said the Supreme Court had 224, 217, and 202 working days in 2019, 2020, and 2021. Likewise, all High Courts have 210 working days a year on average.

A supplementary question came from BJP MP Sushil Modi. He asked if the government would speak to the Chief Justice about switching from vacations for the whole court to individual vacations.

S P Singh Baghel said the Supreme Court and High Courts decide their own working days and the government doesn’t have any say. It’s okay to talk,” he said.

Vivek Tankha suggested the same thing, and Rijiju said: “Definitely, people of India feel that the long vacations the courts get don’t make it easy to get justice.” As the Law Minister, it’s also my bounded duty to communicate with the judiciary what this House feels. No matter what, the court won’t stop working during vacations.”


Hi, my name is Nisha and I'm an educational journalist based in India. I've always been passionate about the power of education to transform lives, and that's what led me to pursue a career in journalism focused on this area. I completed my Bachelor's degree in English from Hindu College in Delhi in 2013 and then went on to earn my Master's in Journalism and Mass Communication from the Indian Institute of Mass Communication in 2017. During my studies, I also completed several short-term courses on Education in India, Sociology, and other related subjects to deepen my knowledge in this field. I'm particularly interested in improving access to quality education in rural areas, where students often face significant challenges. I've worked on a number of initiatives to address this issue, including advocating for better policies, resources, and practices that can make a difference. As an educational journalist, I'm passionate about using my platform to highlight important issues in the education space. I've covered a wide range of topics, including the impact of technology in the classroom, innovative approaches to teaching and learning, and the challenges facing students from marginalized communities. One of the things I love most about my work is the opportunity to constantly learn and grow. I'm an avid reader and believe that reading is key to expanding one's knowledge and perspective. I'm always seeking out new ideas and insights to help me better understand the world around me. In summary, as an educational journalist, I'm dedicated to using my skills and expertise to make a positive impact in the field of education. I'm committed to improving access to quality education for all students and to using my platform to raise awareness about important issues in this area.

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top button