Delhi ( New Delhi)

Centre’s fresh reply to HC: Live telecast could draw sharp reactions, not advisable

The hearing in the same-sex marriage case is likely to be “extremely charged” and may elicit sharp reactions from the public, the Center has detailed in a fresh reply to the Delhi High Court its opposition to a plea seeking a live relay of the proceedings.

In a written reply given on August 20, the Center has also told the High Court that live streaming of court proceedings can be allowed only after a comprehensive framework is put in place through rules to protect data.

“Certain arguments/comments on the part of the lawyers or the Bench may lead to a sharp and unwelcome reaction. Such reactions may either come to the fore in social media or may even enter the real life of the people involved from virtual media,” the reply said.

Presenting its case, the government said that “an extremely robust system of media reportage” exists in the country and the matter “will certainly attract considerable attention”.

Even in previous cases where the proceedings were not “entirely live-streamed”, it said, “serious unrest has occurred and wild and unnecessary allegations have been levelled against the sitting judges of the Supreme Court”.

“It is well known that judges cannot defend themselves in public forums and their views/opinions are expressed in judicial pronouncements,” the government’s reply said, adding that there is also a possibility that live-streamed Content can be “edited or morphed”.

The reply said, “To preserve the seriousness, dignity and solemnity of the proceedings of the Court, especially in cases where sharp ideological differences may exist, it may be advised that the proceedings should not be telecast live.”

The government has further stated that the petitioners are already represented and their lawyers are likely to circulate an update regarding the hearing. It also said that the application seeking a live telecast of the hearing is “more like a direction for the implementation of draft media rules” which are still under consideration by the Delhi High Court.

The Centre’s fresh reply came three months after the division bench of the HC headed by the then Acting Chief Justice Vipin Sanghi asked it to file a “better affidavit”.

The bench had objected to the government’s reply alleging that the purpose of the petition seeking a live relay of the gay case was to “create a dramatic impression of the proceedings and garner sympathy”.

Senior advocate Neeraj Kishan Kaul, counsel for the petitioners, had then told the court that the Center had curtailed the rights of same-sex couples and there should be consequences for using such words.

At least eight petitions seeking legalization of same-sex marriage under the Hindu Marriage Act, the Special Marriage Act, and the Foreign Marriage Act are pending before the court and a declaration that the right to legal recognition of same-sex marriage is a fundamental right. under Articles 14, 15, 19 and 21, irrespective of the sex, sex or sexual orientation of a person.

Seeking dismissal of the petitions, the Centre has argued that marriage in India necessarily depends upon “age-old customs, rituals, practices, cultural ethos and societal values” and that living together as partners and having a sexual relationship by same-sex individuals is “not comparable” with the “Indian family unit concept… of husband, wife and children”.

It also said that there exists a “legitimate state interest” in restricting the recognition of marriage only to persons of the opposite sex.

The matter has now been listed for hearing on Wednesday.

Related Posts


Hi, my name is Nisha and I'm an educational journalist based in India. I've always been passionate about the power of education to transform lives, and that's what led me to pursue a career in journalism focused on this area. I completed my Bachelor's degree in English from Hindu College in Delhi in 2013 and then went on to earn my Master's in Journalism and Mass Communication from the Indian Institute of Mass Communication in 2017. During my studies, I also completed several short-term courses on Education in India, Sociology, and other related subjects to deepen my knowledge in this field. I'm particularly interested in improving access to quality education in rural areas, where students often face significant challenges. I've worked on a number of initiatives to address this issue, including advocating for better policies, resources, and practices that can make a difference. As an educational journalist, I'm passionate about using my platform to highlight important issues in the education space. I've covered a wide range of topics, including the impact of technology in the classroom, innovative approaches to teaching and learning, and the challenges facing students from marginalized communities. One of the things I love most about my work is the opportunity to constantly learn and grow. I'm an avid reader and believe that reading is key to expanding one's knowledge and perspective. I'm always seeking out new ideas and insights to help me better understand the world around me. In summary, as an educational journalist, I'm dedicated to using my skills and expertise to make a positive impact in the field of education. I'm committed to improving access to quality education for all students and to using my platform to raise awareness about important issues in this area.

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top button