Why did it take you so long to take a stance on national security? BJP to Rahul on Digvijaya Singh snub

Why did it take so long for Rahul Gandhi to profess his appreciation for the armed services openly, the BJP asked on Tuesday, criticising the former Congress leader for dismissing Digvijaya Singh’s contentious remarks on surgical strikes as his “personal opinion.”

It also requested that Congress clarify its position on terrorism and national security.

As Gandhi snubbed his party colleague Digvijaya Singh for raising questions on surgical strikes as the BJP seized the row to corner the opposition party, BJP leader and former Union minister Ravi Shankar Prasad stated that the Congress has a habit of projecting unpopular views of its leaders as their personal views and asked if there is a limit to such opinions.

“The question is what these leaders’ standard is regarding respecting our military. “Indians should not seek proof of their heroism, but rather praise them,” Prasad told reporters, noting that Singh has a history of taking unpopular positions, such as visiting the families of suspected terrorists murdered in the Batla House encounter and praising radical Islamic preacher Zakir Naik.

In addition to attacking Gandhi for his “equivocal” stance on the armed forces, he cited some of his previous statements, including a recent remark made in Dausa during the Bharat Jodo Yatra in which he questioned the government’s handling of the border standoff with China and claimed that Chinese soldiers were “beating” Indian soldiers.

After the 2016 surgical strikes, he attacked the Modi government with the “khoon ki dalali” insult and went to Jawaharlal Nehru University (JNU) to lend moral support to the “tukde tukde gang,” Prasad told reporters.

The BJP leader questioned why it took him so many years to state publicly that he respected the military forces. Prasad noted that he should have apologised for what he had said earlier.

He also criticised Congress politician Jairam Ramesh for forcibly blocking a journalist from asking Singh questions about his statement regarding the surgical strikes and the 2019 Pulwama terror attack, in which forty CRPF personnel were killed.

Gandhi stated on Tuesday that he and Congress disagree with Singh’s remarks regarding surgical strikes and that the armed services are not required to provide evidence. In the remarks, he stated that they are absurd.

“I do not agree with Digvijaya Singh’s statement. There is no question that we disagree with it. Gandhi told reporters in Jammu and Kashmir, “This is the official attitude of the Congress.”

Related Posts


Hi, my name is Nisha and I'm an educational journalist based in India. I've always been passionate about the power of education to transform lives, and that's what led me to pursue a career in journalism focused on this area. I completed my Bachelor's degree in English from Hindu College in Delhi in 2013 and then went on to earn my Master's in Journalism and Mass Communication from the Indian Institute of Mass Communication in 2017. During my studies, I also completed several short-term courses on Education in India, Sociology, and other related subjects to deepen my knowledge in this field. I'm particularly interested in improving access to quality education in rural areas, where students often face significant challenges. I've worked on a number of initiatives to address this issue, including advocating for better policies, resources, and practices that can make a difference. As an educational journalist, I'm passionate about using my platform to highlight important issues in the education space. I've covered a wide range of topics, including the impact of technology in the classroom, innovative approaches to teaching and learning, and the challenges facing students from marginalized communities. One of the things I love most about my work is the opportunity to constantly learn and grow. I'm an avid reader and believe that reading is key to expanding one's knowledge and perspective. I'm always seeking out new ideas and insights to help me better understand the world around me. In summary, as an educational journalist, I'm dedicated to using my skills and expertise to make a positive impact in the field of education. I'm committed to improving access to quality education for all students and to using my platform to raise awareness about important issues in this area.

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top button